VS
Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund (FGEP) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FGEP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples, while XIC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, FGEP features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FGEP has returned 13.28% year-to-date with +$60 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 7.53% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FGEP
XIC
| AuM | $308.93 M | $28,819.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.16% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 7, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FGEP | +6.10% | +7.16% | +13.28% | +33.70% | - |
XIC | +1.99% | +3.10% | +7.53% | +37.76% | +79.01% | |
| Flows | FGEP | +$29 M | +$50 M | +$60 M | +$117 M | - |
XIC | +$1,153 M | +$3,786 M | +$5,224 M | +$7,776 M | +$11,193 M |
FGEP vs XIC exposure
Countries
FGEP
USA
43.43%
Canada
27.31%
Other
18.62%
Other
10.64%
XIC
Canada
98.95%
Sectors
FGEP
Other
21.98%
Information Technology
21.54%
Consumer Discretionary
10.34%
Consumer Staples
10.14%
Industrials
9.11%
Other
26.90%
XIC
Financials
28.13%
Energy
18.01%
Materials
15.92%
Other
13.03%
Other
24.92%
As of May 7, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FGEP
NVIDIA
3.76%
APPLE
3.43%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.90%
METRO
2.25%
MICROSOFT-T
2.03%
META PLATFORMS
1.94%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.71%
CA01626P1484
1.61%
IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC
1.57%
BCE
1.41%
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.69%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.31%
ENBRIDGE
3.50%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.01%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.01%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
CA11271J1075
2.65%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.61%
BNS
2.53%
Diversification
FGEP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 206 total
22.61%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
35.80%
Characteristics
Compare
FGEP
XIC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 16, 2024 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FGEP and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FGEP or XIC?
As of May 7, 2026, FGEP has returned 13.28% year to date, while XIC has returned 7.53%. FGEP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FGEP or XIC?
As of May 7, 2026, FGEP manages $308.93 M in assets, while XIC manages $28.82 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FGEP and XIC managed?
FGEP is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FGEP and XIC emphasize?
FGEP is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. XIC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FGEP or XIC?
Year to date, FGEP has seen +$60.10 M in net flows, compared with +$5,224.13 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FGEP and XIC compare?
FGEP has an expense ratio of 1.16%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of FGEP and XIC?
FGEP's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. XIC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: FGEP or XIC?
FGEP holds 197 securities, while XIC holds 193. On holdings count, FGEP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FGEP and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.