VS
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Health Care Sector Index ETF (FHH) and Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FHH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while HIG leans towards Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, FHH features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.75% for HIG. Performance-wise, FHH has returned 0.21% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas HIG is at 9.88% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHH
HIG
| AuM | $6.31 M | $59.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.98% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHH | +0.17% | +1.49% | +0.21% | +9.47% | +9.17% |
HIG | -7.66% | -12.91% | -9.88% | -0.11% | +0.91% | |
| Flows | FHH | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$4 M | -$6 M |
HIG | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$12 M | +$13 M |
FHH vs HIG exposure
Countries
FHH
USA
95.47%
HIG
USA
77.90%
Other
16.60%
Sectors
FHH
Health Care
93.76%
HIG
Health Care
77.20%
Other
20.60%
As of May 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHH
ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY
3.83%
APELLIS PHARMACEUTICALS
2.95%
PFIZER
2.63%
BIOGEN INC
2.40%
CARDINAL HEALTH
2.37%
HCA HEALTHCARE
2.33%
INCYTE
2.19%
IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC
2.18%
INSMED
2.17%
UTD THERAPEUT
2.15%
HIG
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
6.70%
LILLY
5.20%
GILEAD SCIENCES
5.20%
CARDINAL HEALTH
4.80%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
4.80%
HCA HEALTHCARE
4.80%
MCKESSON
4.40%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
4.10%
AMGEN-T
4.00%
US80105N1054
4.00%
Diversification
FHH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
25.20%
HIG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
48.00%
Characteristics
Compare
FHH
HIG
| Provider | First Trust | Brompton Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | StrataQuant Health Care CAD Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.33% | 9.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 30, 2014 | September 24, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about FHH and HIG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHH or HIG?
As of May 11, 2026, FHH has returned 0.21% year to date, while HIG has returned -9.88%. FHH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHH or HIG?
As of May 11, 2026, FHH manages $6.31 M in assets, while HIG manages $59.76 M. HIG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHH and HIG managed?
FHH is passively managed by First Trust. It tracks the StrataQuant Health Care CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HIG is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FHH and HIG emphasize?
FHH is most exposed to Health Care. HIG is most exposed to Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHH or HIG?
Year to date, FHH has seen -$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$7.21 M for HIG. HIG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHH and HIG compare?
FHH has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while HIG has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of FHH and HIG?
FHH's largest holdings include ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY and APELLIS PHARMACEUTICALS. HIG's top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, LILLY, and GILEAD SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHH or HIG?
FHH holds 71 securities, while HIG holds 21. On holdings count, FHH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FHH and HIG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.