VS
Compare CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) vs CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FHI and FHI.B provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care. When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for FHI.B. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 0.16% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas FHI.B is at 2.77% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHI
FHI.B
| AuM | $122.81 M | $5.01 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +2.73% | +0.88% | +0.16% | +9.72% | +17.35% |
FHI.B | +5.06% | +3.99% | +2.77% | +14.76% | +27.71% | |
| Flows | FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
FHI.B | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$11 M |
FHI vs FHI.B exposure
Countries
FHI
USA
95.00%
FHI.B
USA
95.00%
Sectors
FHI
Health Care
99.59%
FHI.B
Health Care
99.59%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHI
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
FHI.B
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
Diversification
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
FHI.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about FHI and FHI.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or FHI.B?
As of June 12, 2026, FHI has returned 0.16% year to date, while FHI.B has returned 2.77%. FHI.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or FHI.B?
As of June 12, 2026, FHI manages $122.81 M in assets, while FHI.B manages $5.01 M. FHI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHI and FHI.B managed?
FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. FHI.B is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FHI and FHI.B emphasize?
FHI is most exposed to Health Care. FHI.B is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or FHI.B?
Year to date, FHI has seen +$22.88 M in net flows, compared with -$0.04 M for FHI.B. FHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHI and FHI.B compare?
FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while FHI.B has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of FHI and FHI.B?
FHI's largest holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP. FHI.B's top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHI or FHI.B?
FHI holds 20 securities, while FHI.B holds 20. On holdings count, FHI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.