VS
Compare CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) vs Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FHI and HHL provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care. When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.85% for HHL. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 0.12% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas HHL is at 5.95% with +$312 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHI
HHL
| AuM | $122.46 M | $1,730.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +4.29% | -0.77% | -0.12% | +10.47% | +17.02% |
HHL | +4.78% | -2.40% | -5.95% | +5.29% | +14.62% | |
| Flows | FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
HHL | +$68 M | +$196 M | +$312 M | +$446 M | +$674 M |
FHI vs HHL exposure
Countries
FHI
USA
95.00%
HHL
USA
84.90%
Other
10.60%
Sectors
FHI
Health Care
99.59%
HHL
Health Care
89.40%
Other
10.60%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHI
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
HHL
MERCK & CO INC
5.70%
ABBVIE
5.60%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.60%
AMGEN-T
5.50%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.50%
ZOETIS INC
5.10%
ABBOTT LABS
5.00%
LILLY
5.00%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
5.00%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
4.90%
Diversification
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
HHL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
52.90%
Characteristics
Compare
FHI
HHL
| Provider | CI | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.06% | 10.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 12, 2018 | December 18, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about FHI and HHL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or HHL?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI has returned -0.12% year to date, while HHL has returned -5.95%. FHI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or HHL?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI manages $122.46 M in assets, while HHL manages $1.73 B. HHL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHI and HHL managed?
FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. HHL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FHI and HHL emphasize?
FHI is most exposed to Health Care. HHL is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or HHL?
Year to date, FHI has seen +$22.88 M in net flows, compared with +$312.33 M for HHL. HHL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHI and HHL compare?
FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while HHL has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of FHI and HHL?
FHI's largest holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP. HHL's top holdings include MERCK & CO INC, ABBVIE, and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHI or HHL?
FHI holds 20 securities, while HHL holds 18. On holdings count, FHI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FHI and HHL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.