CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FHI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while LMAX leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for LMAX. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 0.12% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas LMAX is at 0.9% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $122.46 M | $205.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.80% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +4.29% | -0.77% | -0.12% | +10.47% | +17.02% |
LMAX | +7.15% | +0.43% | -0.90% | +10.89% | - | |
| Flows | FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
LMAX | +$10 M | +$36 M | +$55 M | +$93 M | - |
FHI vs LMAX exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | CI | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.06% | 12.90% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 12, 2018 | February 6, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about FHI and LMAX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or LMAX?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or LMAX?
How are FHI and LMAX managed?
What sectors do FHI and LMAX emphasize?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or LMAX?
How do the fees of FHI and LMAX compare?
What are the top holdings of FHI and LMAX?
Which ETF is more diversified: FHI or LMAX?
Recent articles about FHI and LMAX
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.