VS
Compare CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) vs BMO Covered Call Health Care ETF (ZWHC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FHI and ZWHC provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care. When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.73% for ZWHC. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 0.12% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas ZWHC is at 3.96% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHI
ZWHC
| AuM | $122.46 M | $36.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.73% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +4.29% | -0.77% | -0.12% | +10.47% | +17.02% |
ZWHC | +6.38% | -0.91% | -3.96% | +6.59% | +13.92% | |
| Flows | FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
ZWHC | +$5 M | +$9 M | +$11 M | +$16 M | +$31 M |
FHI vs ZWHC exposure
Countries
FHI
USA
95.00%
ZWHC
USA
95.87%
Sectors
FHI
Health Care
99.59%
ZWHC
Health Care
95.29%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHI
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
ZWHC
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.68%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.51%
CIGNA
5.55%
US58507V1070
5.20%
STRYKER
4.94%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
4.94%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
4.92%
CARDINAL HEALTH
4.91%
AMGEN-T
4.90%
DANAHER
4.90%
Diversification
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
ZWHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.44%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about FHI and ZWHC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or ZWHC?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI has returned -0.12% year to date, while ZWHC has returned -3.96%. FHI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or ZWHC?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI manages $122.46 M in assets, while ZWHC manages $36.84 M. FHI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHI and ZWHC managed?
FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZWHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FHI and ZWHC emphasize?
FHI is most exposed to Health Care. ZWHC is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or ZWHC?
Year to date, FHI has seen +$22.88 M in net flows, compared with +$10.56 M for ZWHC. FHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHI and ZWHC compare?
FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWHC has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of FHI and ZWHC?
FHI's largest holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP. ZWHC's top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CIGNA.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHI or ZWHC?
FHI holds 20 securities, while ZWHC holds 20. On holdings count, FHI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.