VS
CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) and BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FHI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while ZXLV leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLV. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 0.12% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas ZXLV is at 1.57% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHI
ZXLV
| AuM | $122.46 M | $21.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +4.29% | -0.77% | -0.12% | +10.47% | +17.02% |
ZXLV | +9.94% | +3.95% | +1.57% | +17.59% | - | |
| Flows | FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
ZXLV | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$7 M | +$19 M | - |
FHI vs ZXLV exposure
Countries
FHI
USA
95.00%
ZXLV
USA
97.39%
Sectors
FHI
Health Care
99.59%
ZXLV
Health Care
98.41%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHI
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
ZXLV
LILLY
14.09%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
10.54%
ABBVIE
7.10%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.38%
MERCK & CO INC
5.15%
AMGEN-T
3.55%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.42%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
3.09%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.09%
ABBOTT LABS
3.00%
Diversification
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 58 total
59.41%
Characteristics
Compare
FHI
ZXLV
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.06% | 0.49% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 12, 2018 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about FHI and ZXLV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or ZXLV?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI has returned -0.12% year to date, while ZXLV has returned 1.57%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or ZXLV?
As of June 11, 2026, FHI manages $122.46 M in assets, while ZXLV manages $21.27 M. FHI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHI and ZXLV managed?
FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do FHI and ZXLV emphasize?
FHI is most exposed to Health Care. ZXLV is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or ZXLV?
Year to date, FHI has seen +$22.88 M in net flows, compared with +$6.68 M for ZXLV. FHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHI and ZXLV compare?
FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of FHI and ZXLV?
FHI's largest holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP. ZXLV's top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON, and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHI or ZXLV?
FHI holds 20 securities, while ZXLV holds 55. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.