VS
When evaluating costs, FHIS features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, FHIS has returned 1.48% year-to-date with +$93 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.75% with +$285 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHIS
ZSP
| AuM | $388.32 M | $23,773.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHIS | +0.23% | +0.75% | +1.48% | +3.20% | +13.76% |
ZSP | -0.20% | +7.33% | +11.75% | +21.86% | +80.75% | |
| Flows | FHIS | +$30 M | +$67 M | +$93 M | +$171 M | +$334 M |
ZSP | -$338 M | +$44 M | +$285 M | +$842 M | +$4,796 M |
FHIS vs ZSP exposure
Countries
FHIS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.86%
Sectors
FHIS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
46.52%
Finance
12.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.38%
Healthcare
8.23%
Industrials
7.68%
Other
15.54%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHIS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.51%
Broadcom Inc.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Tesla, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Diversification
FHIS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
39.24%
Characteristics
Compare
FHIS
ZSP
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.25% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 12, 2022 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about FHIS and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHIS or ZSP?
As of July 17, 2026, FHIS has returned 1.48% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.75%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHIS or ZSP?
As of July 17, 2026, FHIS manages $388.32 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.77 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHIS and ZSP managed?
FHIS is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHIS or ZSP?
Year to date, FHIS has seen +$93.00 M in net flows, compared with +$284.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHIS and ZSP compare?
FHIS has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about FHIS and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.