VS
When evaluating costs, FIE features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.6% for PRA. Performance-wise, FIE has returned 15.17% year-to-date with -$49 M in net flows, whereas PRA is at 30.13% with +$146 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FIE
PRA
| AuM | $1,377.37 M | $284.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.74% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FIE | -0.16% | -3.16% | +15.17% | +25.23% | +109.83% |
PRA | -0.05% | +6.35% | +30.13% | +31.05% | +72.42% | |
| Flows | FIE | -$8 M | -$16 M | -$49 M | -$51 M | -$155 M |
PRA | +$22 M | +$53 M | +$146 M | +$161 M | +$168 M |
FIE vs PRA exposure
Countries
FIE
Canada
98.00%
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FIE
Finance
84.74%
Other
15.26%
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FIE
Royal Bank of Canada
8.15%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
8.12%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
7.26%
Manulife Financial Corp.
6.82%
Bank of Montreal
6.37%
National Bank of Canada
6.15%
Power Corp of Canada
4.04%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
3.60%
iA Financial Corp., Inc.
3.50%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.65%
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FIE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,514 total
56.66%
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FIE
PRA
| Provider | iShares | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.32% | 2.02% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 16, 2010 | September 5, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about FIE and PRA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FIE or PRA?
As of October 15, 2026, FIE has returned 15.17% year to date, while PRA has returned 30.13%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FIE or PRA?
As of October 15, 2026, FIE manages $1.38 B in assets, while PRA manages $284.27 M. FIE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FIE and PRA managed?
FIE is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FIE or PRA?
Year to date, FIE has seen -$49.11 M in net flows, compared with +$146.20 M for PRA. PRA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FIE and PRA compare?
FIE has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
Recent articles about FIE and PRA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.