VS
When evaluating costs, FLGA features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FLGA has returned 0.39% year-to-date with -$12 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.01% with -$126 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLGA
ZUT
| AuM | $389.37 M | $852.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLGA | -0.40% | -0.61% | -0.39% | +1.48% | +7.49% |
ZUT | +1.71% | +5.71% | +22.01% | +27.22% | +54.59% | |
| Flows | FLGA | +$1 M | -$1 M | -$12 M | -$35 M | +$45 M |
ZUT | -$60 M | -$66 M | -$126 M | -$42 M | +$188 M |
FLGA vs ZUT exposure
Countries
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.77%
Bermuda
16.23%
Sectors
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
84.34%
Energy
8.20%
Industrials
7.46%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.57%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.77%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.20%
Capital Power Corp.
8.05%
TransAlta Corp.
7.83%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.73%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.46%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.33%
ATCO Ltd.
7.25%
Emera, Inc.
7.16%
Diversification
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.35%
Characteristics
Compare
FLGA
ZUT
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.72% | 2.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2018 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FLGA and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLGA or ZUT?
As of July 17, 2026, FLGA has returned -0.39% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.01%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLGA or ZUT?
As of July 17, 2026, FLGA manages $389.37 M in assets, while ZUT manages $852.91 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLGA and ZUT managed?
FLGA is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLGA or ZUT?
Year to date, FLGA has seen -$12.37 M in net flows, compared with -$125.69 M for ZUT. FLGA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLGA and ZUT compare?
FLGA has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about FLGA and ZUT
ETF Issuer Series: Franklin Templeton
Franklin Templeton’s growing ETF product shelf. Read our analysis.
Posted on 1/19/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.