FMNA
Fidelity Market Neutral Alternative Fund

Full FMNA fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, FMNA features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FMNA has returned 3.78% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 10.34% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FMNA
+1.23%+2.17%+3.78%+4.90%-
XIC
+1.77%+5.27%+10.34%+33.79%+89.23%
Flows
FMNA
-$0 M-$2 M-$2 M-$2 M-
XIC
+$408 M+$2,783 M+$5,643 M+$7,720 M+$11,682 M

FMNA vs XIC exposure

Countries

FMNA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%

Sectors

FMNA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FMNA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%

Diversification

FMNA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Exposure data will be available soon

Characteristics

Compare
FMNA
XIC
ProviderFidelityiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.03%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2024February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about FMNA and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FMNA or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, FMNA has returned 3.78% year to date, while XIC has returned 10.34%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FMNA or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, FMNA manages $2.24 M in assets, while XIC manages $29.99 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FMNA and XIC managed?
FMNA is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FMNA or XIC?
Year to date, FMNA has seen -$2.16 M in net flows, compared with +$5,643.19 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FMNA and XIC compare?
FMNA has an expense ratio of 1.50%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about FMNA and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds