VS
When evaluating costs, FTHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, FTHI has returned 7.44% year-to-date with +$28 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 21.64% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FTHI
HEWB
| AuM | $74.07 M | $307.01 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.78% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTHI | -1.19% | +3.07% | +7.44% | +18.86% | - |
HEWB | +5.66% | +18.78% | +21.64% | +62.64% | +139.85% | |
| Flows | FTHI | +$14 M | +$16 M | +$28 M | +$37 M | - |
HEWB | +$0 M | +$8 M | +$12 M | +$9 M | +$14 M |
FTHI vs HEWB exposure
Countries
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
99.99%
Sectors
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of June 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%
Diversification
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%
Characteristics
Compare
FTHI
HEWB
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.02% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 16, 2024 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FTHI and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FTHI or HEWB?
As of June 8, 2026, FTHI has returned 7.44% year to date, while HEWB has returned 21.64%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FTHI or HEWB?
As of June 8, 2026, FTHI manages $74.07 M in assets, while HEWB manages $307.01 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FTHI and HEWB managed?
FTHI is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FTHI or HEWB?
Year to date, FTHI has seen +$27.84 M in net flows, compared with +$12.25 M for HEWB. FTHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FTHI and HEWB compare?
FTHI has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about FTHI and HEWB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
HEB ETF Spotlight: Hamilton's Newest Addition to its ETF Offering
Meet HEB, Hamilton’s new low-cost Big Six Canadian Bank ETF.
Posted on 5/2/2023 by ETF Market Canada inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.