VS
When evaluating costs, FXM features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.35% for FCUV. Performance-wise, FXM has returned 21.24% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas FCUV is at 18.05% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FXM
FCUV
| AuM | $554.59 M | $4,522.81 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.64% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.96% | -0.83% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FXM | +2.00% | +4.28% | +21.24% | +32.62% | +131.79% |
FCUV | +0.76% | -0.11% | +18.05% | +24.07% | +109.94% | |
| Flows | FXM | +$10 M | +$42 M | +$15 M | -$2 M | -$30 M |
FCUV | +$227 M | +$618 M | +$1,881 M | +$2,195 M | +$3,438 M |
FXM vs FCUV exposure
Countries
FXM
Canada
99.86%
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FXM
Non-Energy Materials
22.76%
Finance
16.61%
Energy
16.23%
Utilities
12.78%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.39%
Telecommunications
8.76%
Other
13.46%
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FXM
Centerra Gold, Inc.
4.70%
Torex Gold Resources, Inc.
3.89%
Russel Metals, Inc.
3.78%
CGI, Inc.
3.62%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.61%
OceanaGold Corp.
3.60%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.57%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.57%
Open Text Corp.
3.54%
Parex Resources, Inc.
3.46%
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FXM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
37.33%
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FXM
FCUV
| Provider | CI | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Canada Target Value Total Return Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.82% | 1.49% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 13, 2012 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about FXM and FCUV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FXM or FCUV?
As of October 21, 2026, FXM has returned 21.24% year to date, while FCUV has returned 18.05%. FXM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FXM or FCUV?
As of October 21, 2026, FXM manages $554.59 M in assets, while FCUV manages $4.52 B. FCUV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FXM and FCUV managed?
FXM is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Morningstar Canada Target Value Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FXM or FCUV?
Year to date, FXM has seen +$15.50 M in net flows, compared with +$1,880.61 M for FCUV. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FXM and FCUV compare?
FXM has an expense ratio of 0.64%, while FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Recent articles about FXM and FCUV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.