VS
Compare iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS) vs TD Conservative ETF Portfolio (TCON) to find the best fit for your portfolio. GCNS provides Finance, Sovereign, and Technology exposures, while TCON is primarily weighted in Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal. When evaluating costs, GCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.27% for TCON. Performance-wise, GCNS has returned 7.19% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas TCON is at 5.9% with +$49 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GCNS
TCON
| AuM | $88.63 M | $135.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.22% | 0.27% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GCNS | -0.74% | +0.73% | +7.19% | +11.15% | +41.70% |
TCON | +0.72% | +0.66% | +5.90% | +10.04% | +35.10% | |
| Flows | GCNS | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$26 M | +$37 M | +$62 M |
TCON | +$6 M | +$12 M | +$49 M | +$68 M | +$110 M |
GCNS vs TCON exposure
Countries
GCNS
Canada
63.58%
USA
24.09%
Other
12.33%
TCON
Canada
72.09%
USA
16.44%
Other
11.47%
Sectors
GCNS
Finance
33.44%
Sovereign
16.79%
Technology
12.65%
Municipal
12.53%
Other
24.59%
TCON
Sovereign
21.13%
Finance
18.21%
Municipal
16.18%
Technology
8.87%
Other
35.60%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.34%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.30%
Canada, Bond 2 1jun2028 10Y
1.29%
Broadcom Inc.
1.25%
Shopify, Inc.
1.00%
Canada, Bond 1.25 1jun2030 10Y
0.97%
Bank of Montreal
0.82%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
0.76%
Canada, Bond 0.5 1oct2030 10Y
0.74%
TCON
Royal Bank of Canada
1.23%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.11%
Apple, Inc.
1.05%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2036, CAD
0.94%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
0.90%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.85%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
0.84%
Microsoft Corp.
0.81%
Canada, Bond 1.5 1jun2031 10Y
0.80%
Canada, Bonds 1.5% 1dec2031 10Y
0.80%
Diversification
GCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,382 total
11.45%
TCON
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,307 total
9.31%
Characteristics
Compare
GCNS
TCON
| Provider | iShares | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.09% | 2.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | September 14, 2020 | August 18, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about GCNS and TCON
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GCNS or TCON?
As of September 3, 2026, GCNS has returned 7.19% year to date, while TCON has returned 5.90%. GCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GCNS or TCON?
As of September 3, 2026, GCNS manages $88.63 M in assets, while TCON manages $135.41 M. TCON is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GCNS and TCON managed?
GCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. TCON is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do GCNS and TCON emphasize?
GCNS is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Technology. TCON is most exposed to Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GCNS or TCON?
Year to date, GCNS has seen +$26.21 M in net flows, compared with +$49.38 M for TCON. TCON has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GCNS and TCON compare?
GCNS has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while TCON has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of GCNS and TCON?
GCNS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Royal Bank of Canada, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. TCON's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, NVIDIA Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GCNS or TCON?
GCNS holds 1375 securities, while TCON holds 3267. On holdings count, TCON is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.