GCNS
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio

Full GCNS fund page
VS
VCNS
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio

Full VCNS fund page

Compare iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS) vs Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. GCNS provides Finance, Sovereign, and Technology exposures, while VCNS is primarily weighted in Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal. When evaluating costs, GCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.22% for VCNS. Performance-wise, GCNS has returned 6.75% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas VCNS is at 5.51% with +$194 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.00.5%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
GCNS
-1.14%-0.06%+6.75%+11.04%+41.12%
VCNS
-1.18%-0.40%+5.51%+9.99%+36.96%
Flows
GCNS
+$3 M+$12 M+$26 M+$37 M+$62 M
VCNS
+$18 M+$74 M+$194 M+$306 M+$357 M

GCNS vs VCNS exposure

Countries

GCNS
Canada
63.58%
USA
24.09%
Other
12.33%
VCNS
Canada
46.44%
USA
28.26%
Other
25.30%

Sectors

GCNS
Finance
33.44%
Sovereign
16.79%
Technology
12.65%
Municipal
12.53%
Other
24.59%
VCNS
Sovereign
25.41%
Finance
18.86%
Municipal
11.13%
Technology
10.75%
Other
33.85%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

GCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.34%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.30%
Canada, Bond 2 1jun2028 10Y
1.29%
Broadcom Inc.
1.25%
Shopify, Inc.
1.00%
Canada, Bond 1.25 1jun2030 10Y
0.97%
Bank of Montreal
0.82%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
0.76%
Canada, Bond 0.5 1oct2030 10Y
0.74%
VCNS
NVIDIA Corp.
1.17%
Apple, Inc.
1.15%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.04%
Microsoft Corp.
0.87%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.71%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.67%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2031, CAD
0.64%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1sep2030, CAD
0.57%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1dec2035, CAD
0.55%
Canada, Bonds 3.25% 1jun2036, CAD
0.54%

Diversification

GCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,382 total
11.45%
VCNS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,981 total
7.91%

Characteristics

Compare
GCNS
VCNS
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.10%2.49%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateSeptember 14, 2020February 1, 2018

Frequently asked questions about GCNS and VCNS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: GCNS or VCNS?
As of September 2, 2026, GCNS has returned 6.75% year to date, while VCNS has returned 5.51%. GCNS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GCNS or VCNS?
As of September 2, 2026, GCNS manages $88.26 M in assets, while VCNS manages $962.49 M. VCNS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GCNS and VCNS managed?
GCNS is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. VCNS is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
What sectors do GCNS and VCNS emphasize?
GCNS is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Technology. VCNS is most exposed to Sovereign, Finance, and Municipal.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GCNS or VCNS?
Year to date, GCNS has seen +$26.21 M in net flows, compared with +$193.82 M for VCNS. VCNS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GCNS and VCNS compare?
GCNS has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while VCNS has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What are the top holdings of GCNS and VCNS?
GCNS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Royal Bank of Canada, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. VCNS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GCNS or VCNS?
GCNS holds 1375 securities, while VCNS holds 28148. On holdings count, VCNS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about GCNS and VCNS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds