VS
When evaluating costs, GCTB features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.2% for MNY. Performance-wise, GCTB has returned 1.82% year-to-date with -$8 M in net flows, whereas MNY is at 2.04% with +$226 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GCTB
MNY
| AuM | $240.23 M | $1,831.13 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GCTB | +0.19% | +0.54% | +1.82% | +2.18% | +10.61% |
MNY | +0.20% | +0.59% | +2.04% | +2.45% | +10.98% | |
| Flows | GCTB | +$16 M | +$7 M | -$8 M | -$18 M | +$193 M |
MNY | -$13 M | -$60 M | +$226 M | +$211 M | +$1,426 M |
GCTB vs MNY exposure
Countries
GCTB
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
GCTB
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GCTB
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
GCTB
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
GCTB
MNY
| Provider | Guardian Capital | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.14% | 2.42% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | September 14, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about GCTB and MNY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GCTB or MNY?
As of November 5, 2026, GCTB has returned 1.82% year to date, while MNY has returned 2.04%. MNY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GCTB or MNY?
As of November 5, 2026, GCTB manages $240.23 M in assets, while MNY manages $1.83 B. MNY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GCTB and MNY managed?
GCTB is actively managed by Guardian Capital. It does not track an index. MNY is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GCTB or MNY?
Year to date, GCTB has seen -$7.84 M in net flows, compared with +$225.54 M for MNY. MNY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GCTB and MNY compare?
GCTB has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while MNY has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
Recent articles about GCTB and MNY
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.