VS
When evaluating costs, GDIV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.4% for TQGD. Performance-wise, GDIV has returned 20.99% year-to-date with +$80 M in net flows, whereas TQGD is at 22.6% with +$350 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GDIV
TQGD
| AuM | $100.49 M | $1,032.93 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.37% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GDIV | +0.16% | -0.77% | +20.99% | +19.46% | +75.23% |
TQGD | +1.15% | +2.62% | +22.60% | +21.72% | +86.92% | |
| Flows | GDIV | +$6 M | +$21 M | +$80 M | +$84 M | +$78 M |
TQGD | +$46 M | +$114 M | +$350 M | +$384 M | +$702 M |
GDIV vs TQGD exposure
Countries
GDIV
Other
100.00%
TQGD
USA
62.20%
Japan
7.85%
Other
29.95%
Sectors
GDIV
Other
100.00%
TQGD
Technology
33.89%
Finance
20.96%
Industrials
8.81%
Healthcare
8.27%
Other
28.07%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GDIV
CA56503P1080
68.05%
CA56503T1003
24.06%
CA56502U1084
5.64%
CA56502Q1072
2.01%
TQGD
NVIDIA Corp.
5.88%
Apple, Inc.
4.87%
Microsoft Corp.
3.18%
HP, Inc.
2.05%
Pfizer Inc.
1.85%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.79%
Best Buy Co., Inc.
1.74%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.74%
Accenture Plc
1.73%
The Progressive Corp.
1.68%
Diversification
GDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
99.76%
TQGD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
26.52%
Characteristics
Compare
GDIV
TQGD
| Provider | Manulife Investments | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.47% | 2.18% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 15, 2023 | November 26, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about GDIV and TQGD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GDIV or TQGD?
As of November 11, 2026, GDIV has returned 20.99% year to date, while TQGD has returned 22.60%. TQGD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GDIV or TQGD?
As of November 11, 2026, GDIV manages $100.49 M in assets, while TQGD manages $1.03 B. TQGD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GDIV and TQGD managed?
GDIV is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index. TQGD is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GDIV or TQGD?
Year to date, GDIV has seen +$79.75 M in net flows, compared with +$350.17 M for TQGD. TQGD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GDIV and TQGD compare?
GDIV has an expense ratio of 0.37%, while TQGD has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
Which ETF is more diversified: GDIV or TQGD?
GDIV holds 1 securities, while TQGD holds 199. On holdings count, TQGD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about GDIV and TQGD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.