VS
When evaluating costs, GLCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, GLCC has returned 0.68% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 20.67% with -$432 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLCC
HBNK
| AuM | $578.22 M | $745.87 M |
| Management Fees | 0.78% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.43% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLCC | -7.85% | -20.09% | -0.68% | +69.37% | +138.57% |
HBNK | +7.52% | +15.12% | +20.67% | +65.75% | - | |
| Flows | GLCC | +$17 M | +$7 M | +$9 M | +$23 M | +$56 M |
HBNK | +$33 M | -$353 M | -$432 M | -$689 M | - |
GLCC vs HBNK exposure
Countries
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.99%
Sectors
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of May 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%
Diversification
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%
Characteristics
Compare
GLCC
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.13% | 2.75% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 11, 2011 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about GLCC and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLCC or HBNK?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC has returned -0.68% year to date, while HBNK has returned 20.67%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLCC or HBNK?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC manages $578.22 M in assets, while HBNK manages $745.87 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLCC and HBNK managed?
GLCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLCC or HBNK?
Year to date, GLCC has seen +$9.36 M in net flows, compared with -$432.26 M for HBNK. GLCC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLCC and HBNK compare?
GLCC has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about GLCC and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.