VS
When evaluating costs, GLCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, GLCC has returned 0.68% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 20.62% with -$1,218 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLCC
ZEB
| AuM | $578.22 M | $5,297.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.78% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.67% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLCC | -7.85% | -20.09% | -0.68% | +69.37% | +138.57% |
ZEB | +7.53% | +15.10% | +20.62% | +65.53% | +133.76% | |
| Flows | GLCC | +$17 M | +$7 M | +$9 M | +$23 M | +$56 M |
ZEB | -$207 M | -$574 M | -$1,218 M | -$1,169 M | -$1,746 M |
GLCC vs ZEB exposure
Countries
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
Diversification
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
GLCC
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.13% | 2.50% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 11, 2011 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about GLCC and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLCC or ZEB?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC has returned -0.68% year to date, while ZEB has returned 20.62%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLCC or ZEB?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC manages $578.22 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.30 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLCC and ZEB managed?
GLCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLCC or ZEB?
Year to date, GLCC has seen +$9.36 M in net flows, compared with -$1,218.47 M for ZEB. GLCC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLCC and ZEB compare?
GLCC has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about GLCC and ZEB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.