GLCC
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Full GLCC fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, GLCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, GLCC has returned 0.68% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.26% with +$344 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Apr 22Apr 29May 6May 13May 21

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 22, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
GLCC
-7.85%-20.09%-0.68%+69.37%+138.57%
ZSP
+5.88%+10.47%+10.26%+28.69%+90.41%
Flows
GLCC
+$17 M+$7 M+$9 M+$23 M+$56 M
ZSP
+$13 M+$177 M+$344 M+$1,502 M+$4,761 M

GLCC vs ZSP exposure

Countries

GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.98%

Sectors

GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
33.63%
Financials
10.49%
Communication Services
10.10%
Consumer Discretionary
9.94%
Health Care
9.40%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
18.10%
As of May 22, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.39%
APPLE
6.67%
MICROSOFT-T
4.90%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.93%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.56%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.35%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.60%

Diversification

GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.04%

Characteristics

Compare
GLCC
ZSP
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.13%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 11, 2011November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about GLCC and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLCC or ZSP?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC has returned -0.68% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.26%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLCC or ZSP?
As of May 22, 2026, GLCC manages $578.22 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.56 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLCC and ZSP managed?
GLCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLCC or ZSP?
Year to date, GLCC has seen +$9.36 M in net flows, compared with +$344.12 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLCC and ZSP compare?
GLCC has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about GLCC and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds