VS
When evaluating costs, GLDD features a management fee (MER) of 1.8%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, GLDD has returned 2.46% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.5% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLDD
XIC
| AuM | $3.13 M | $31,310.89 M |
| Management Fees | 1.80% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 2.02% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLDD | +16.97% | +42.95% | +2.46% | -39.93% | -77.32% |
XIC | +0.59% | +3.22% | +12.50% | +31.70% | +89.28% | |
| Flows | GLDD | -$3 M | -$5 M | -$2 M | +$0 M | +$4 M |
XIC | +$820 M | +$1,912 M | +$6,530 M | +$7,821 M | +$12,618 M |
GLDD vs XIC exposure
Countries
GLDD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.41%
Sectors
GLDD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
39.60%
Non-Energy Materials
18.18%
Energy
16.99%
Industrials
8.23%
Other
16.99%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLDD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Shopify, Inc.
4.05%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.32%
Bank of Montreal
3.18%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.81%
Brookfield Corp.
2.78%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.62%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.55%
Diversification
GLDD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 220 total
36.78%
Characteristics
Compare
GLDD
XIC
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 22, 2008 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about GLDD and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDD or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, GLDD has returned 2.46% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.50%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDD or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, GLDD manages $3.13 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.31 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDD and XIC managed?
GLDD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDD or XIC?
Year to date, GLDD has seen -$2.42 M in net flows, compared with +$6,530.40 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDD and XIC compare?
GLDD has an expense ratio of 2.02%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about GLDD and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.