VS
When evaluating costs, GLDU features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, GLDU has returned 0.59% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 28.1% with -$514 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLDU
HBNK
| AuM | $55.45 M | $709.46 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.60% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLDU | +27.14% | -0.55% | -0.59% | +57.49% | +268.94% |
HBNK | -3.93% | +6.91% | +28.10% | +57.37% | +154.68% | |
| Flows | GLDU | -$3 M | -$3 M | +$6 M | +$8 M | +$11 M |
HBNK | -$51 M | -$82 M | -$514 M | -$870 M | -$77 M |
GLDU vs HBNK exposure
Countries
GLDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.94%
Sectors
GLDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of August 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%
Diversification
GLDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
GLDU
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.66% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 22, 2008 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about GLDU and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDU or HBNK?
As of August 21, 2026, GLDU has returned -0.59% year to date, while HBNK has returned 28.10%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDU or HBNK?
As of August 21, 2026, GLDU manages $55.45 M in assets, while HBNK manages $709.46 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDU and HBNK managed?
GLDU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDU or HBNK?
Year to date, GLDU has seen +$6.26 M in net flows, compared with -$513.54 M for HBNK. GLDU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDU and HBNK compare?
GLDU has an expense ratio of 1.60%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about GLDU and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.