VS
When evaluating costs, GLDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, GLDX has returned 1.54% year-to-date with -$15 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 21.32% with -$76 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLDX
ZUT
| AuM | $237.51 M | $892.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.46% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.02% | -0.71% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLDX | -0.89% | +3.92% | +1.54% | +22.56% | - |
ZUT | +4.34% | +2.54% | +21.32% | +15.44% | +71.25% | |
| Flows | GLDX | +$2 M | -$21 M | -$15 M | -$26 M | - |
ZUT | -$19 M | +$32 M | -$76 M | -$22 M | +$243 M |
GLDX vs ZUT exposure
Countries
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%
Sectors
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%
Diversification
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%
Characteristics
Compare
GLDX
ZUT
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.96% | 2.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about GLDX and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDX or ZUT?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX has returned 1.54% year to date, while ZUT has returned 21.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDX or ZUT?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX manages $237.51 M in assets, while ZUT manages $892.31 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDX and ZUT managed?
GLDX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDX or ZUT?
Year to date, GLDX has seen -$14.85 M in net flows, compared with -$75.82 M for ZUT. GLDX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDX and ZUT compare?
GLDX has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about GLDX and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.