VS
When evaluating costs, GRCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, GRCC has returned 10.15% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 13.29% with +$296 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GRCC
ZSP
| AuM | $20.15 M | $24,113.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRCC | -0.53% | +6.69% | +10.15% | +19.05% | - |
ZSP | +1.27% | +9.93% | +13.29% | +23.92% | +82.35% | |
| Flows | GRCC | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$8 M | +$8 M | - |
ZSP | -$90 M | +$7 M | +$296 M | +$905 M | +$5,132 M |
GRCC vs ZSP exposure
Countries
GRCC
Other
100.00%
ZSP
USA
97.59%
Sectors
GRCC
Other
100.00%
ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
As of July 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GRCC
CA37964A1030
27.55%
CA37962B1031
20.21%
CA3799261084
18.15%
CA37964D1078
17.05%
CA37955S1056
7.26%
CA37962P1027
5.95%
CA37893D1033
3.55%
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%
Diversification
GRCC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7 total
99.72%
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%
Characteristics
Compare
GRCC
ZSP
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.37% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 10, 2023 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about GRCC and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GRCC or ZSP?
As of July 21, 2026, GRCC has returned 10.15% year to date, while ZSP has returned 13.29%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GRCC or ZSP?
As of July 21, 2026, GRCC manages $20.15 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.11 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GRCC and ZSP managed?
GRCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GRCC or ZSP?
Year to date, GRCC has seen +$8.00 M in net flows, compared with +$296.48 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GRCC and ZSP compare?
GRCC has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRCC or ZSP?
GRCC holds 1 securities, while ZSP holds 495. On holdings count, ZSP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about GRCC and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
BMO ETF Spotlight - More than Just a Bank
BMO is more than just a bank, learn more about BMO’s extensive ETF offerings.
Posted on 3/22/2023 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.