VS
When evaluating costs, HAL features a management fee (MER) of 0.68%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HAL has returned 17.86% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 25.35% with -$415 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HAL
HBNK
| AuM | $126.18 M | $791.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.68% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.69% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HAL | +2.66% | +8.88% | +17.86% | +42.49% | +75.52% |
HBNK | +8.46% | +23.65% | +25.35% | +68.05% | - | |
| Flows | HAL | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$9 M | -$30 M | -$69 M |
HBNK | +$31 M | -$184 M | -$415 M | -$667 M | - |
HAL vs HBNK exposure
Countries
HAL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
HAL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HAL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
HAL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
HAL
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.96% | 2.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 9, 2010 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about HAL and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HAL or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, HAL has returned 17.86% year to date, while HBNK has returned 25.35%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HAL or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, HAL manages $126.18 M in assets, while HBNK manages $791.30 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HAL and HBNK managed?
HAL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HAL or HBNK?
Year to date, HAL has seen -$9.27 M in net flows, compared with -$414.83 M for HBNK. HAL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HAL and HBNK compare?
HAL has an expense ratio of 0.69%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about HAL and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.