VS
Global X Active Global Dividend ETF (HAZ) and BMO MSCI World ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HAZ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals, while ESGG leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HAZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.25% for ESGG. Performance-wise, HAZ has returned 14.04% year-to-date with -$165 M in net flows, whereas ESGG is at 15.29% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HAZ
ESGG
| AuM | $428.85 M | $62.55 M |
| Management Fees | 0.78% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HAZ | +0.23% | +1.05% | +14.04% | +12.11% | +66.21% |
ESGG | -0.30% | +3.86% | +15.29% | +15.64% | +86.60% | |
| Flows | HAZ | -$13 M | -$37 M | -$165 M | -$172 M | -$40 M |
ESGG | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$12 M |
HAZ vs ESGG exposure
Countries
HAZ
USA
75.86%
Other
24.14%
ESGG
USA
70.81%
Other
29.19%
Sectors
HAZ
Technology
37.56%
Finance
25.50%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.44%
Other
29.50%
ESGG
Technology
38.12%
Finance
17.58%
Healthcare
10.11%
Industrials
9.04%
Other
25.15%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HAZ
Visa, Inc.
6.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.24%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.11%
Lam Research Corp.
4.42%
KLA Corp.
3.31%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.47%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.13%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.02%
Accenture Plc
1.99%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.87%
ESGG
NVIDIA Corp.
10.46%
Microsoft Corp.
7.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.30%
Tesla, Inc.
2.04%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.96%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.58%
ASML Holding NV
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.34%
Visa, Inc.
1.33%
Diversification
HAZ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 88 total
34.60%
ESGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 652 total
35.12%
Characteristics
Compare
HAZ
ESGG
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.02% | 0.85% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 21, 2010 | January 27, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HAZ and ESGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HAZ or ESGG?
As of October 20, 2026, HAZ has returned 14.04% year to date, while ESGG has returned 15.29%. ESGG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HAZ or ESGG?
As of October 20, 2026, HAZ manages $428.85 M in assets, while ESGG manages $62.55 M. HAZ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HAZ and ESGG managed?
HAZ is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ESGG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI World Selection NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HAZ and ESGG emphasize?
HAZ is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals. ESGG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HAZ or ESGG?
Year to date, HAZ has seen -$165.49 M in net flows, compared with +$3.22 M for ESGG. ESGG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HAZ and ESGG compare?
HAZ has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while ESGG has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HAZ and ESGG?
HAZ's largest holdings include Visa, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Mastercard, Inc.. ESGG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HAZ or ESGG?
HAZ holds 88 securities, while ESGG holds 647. On holdings count, ESGG is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.