VS
Global X Active Global Dividend ETF (HAZ) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HAZ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals, while XSUS leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HAZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.2% for XSUS. Performance-wise, HAZ has returned 14.04% year-to-date with -$165 M in net flows, whereas XSUS is at 16.27% with +$45 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HAZ
XSUS
| AuM | $428.85 M | $736.88 M |
| Management Fees | 0.78% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HAZ | +0.23% | +1.05% | +14.04% | +12.11% | +66.21% |
XSUS | -0.44% | +3.46% | +16.27% | +15.54% | +91.54% | |
| Flows | HAZ | -$13 M | -$37 M | -$165 M | -$172 M | -$40 M |
XSUS | -$3 M | -$6 M | +$45 M | +$40 M | +$59 M |
HAZ vs XSUS exposure
Countries
HAZ
USA
75.86%
Other
24.14%
XSUS
USA
97.19%
Sectors
HAZ
Technology
37.56%
Finance
25.50%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.44%
Other
29.50%
XSUS
Technology
45.31%
Finance
13.86%
Healthcare
9.90%
Industrials
7.80%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.79%
Other
15.34%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HAZ
Visa, Inc.
6.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.24%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.11%
Lam Research Corp.
4.42%
KLA Corp.
3.31%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.47%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.13%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.02%
Accenture Plc
1.99%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.87%
XSUS
NVIDIA Corp.
7.67%
Apple, Inc.
6.90%
Microsoft Corp.
5.44%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.41%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.74%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
Tesla, Inc.
1.56%
Diversification
HAZ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 88 total
34.60%
XSUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 271 total
36.46%
Characteristics
Compare
HAZ
XSUS
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.02% | 0.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | July 21, 2010 | March 18, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about HAZ and XSUS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HAZ or XSUS?
As of October 20, 2026, HAZ has returned 14.04% year to date, while XSUS has returned 16.27%. XSUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HAZ or XSUS?
As of October 20, 2026, HAZ manages $428.85 M in assets, while XSUS manages $736.88 M. XSUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HAZ and XSUS managed?
HAZ is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. XSUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HAZ and XSUS emphasize?
HAZ is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals. XSUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HAZ or XSUS?
Year to date, HAZ has seen -$165.49 M in net flows, compared with +$45.19 M for XSUS. XSUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HAZ and XSUS compare?
HAZ has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while XSUS has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of HAZ and XSUS?
HAZ's largest holdings include Visa, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Mastercard, Inc.. XSUS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HAZ or XSUS?
HAZ holds 88 securities, while XSUS holds 270. On holdings count, XSUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HAZ and XSUS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.