VS
When evaluating costs, HBA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.75% for DXF. Performance-wise, HBA has returned 5.09% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas DXF is at 1.46% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBA
DXF
| AuM | $134.25 M | $9.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.70% | 0.84% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBA | +3.37% | -2.19% | +5.09% | +1.85% | +73.04% |
DXF | +2.80% | -2.17% | +1.46% | +5.12% | +83.94% | |
| Flows | HBA | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$6 M | -$5 M | -$34 M |
DXF | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$7 M | -$6 M |
HBA vs DXF exposure
Countries
HBA
Australia
101.15%
DXF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HBA
Finance
101.15%
DXF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBA
Macquarie Group Ltd.
25.68%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
20.32%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
20.11%
Westpac Banking Corp.
17.76%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
17.28%
DXF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HBA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
101.15%
DXF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HBA
DXF
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | Dynamic Funds |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.04% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | September 22, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about HBA and DXF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBA or DXF?
As of October 27, 2026, HBA has returned 5.09% year to date, while DXF has returned 1.46%. HBA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBA or DXF?
As of October 27, 2026, HBA manages $134.25 M in assets, while DXF manages $9.44 M. HBA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBA and DXF managed?
HBA is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUD benchmark. DXF is actively managed by Dynamic Funds. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBA or DXF?
Year to date, HBA has seen -$6.02 M in net flows, compared with -$7.17 M for DXF. HBA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBA and DXF compare?
HBA has an expense ratio of 0.70%, while DXF has an expense ratio of 0.84%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.