VS
Compare Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF (HBF) vs Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF (HBF.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HBF and HBF.U provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, HBF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.75% for HBF.U. Performance-wise, HBF has returned 6.65% year-to-date with +$26 M in net flows, whereas HBF.U is at 7.54% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBF
HBF.U
| AuM | $562.25 M | $41.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.91% | 0.91% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBF | +0.52% | +9.94% | +6.65% | +21.31% | +45.91% |
HBF.U | +0.67% | +10.50% | +7.54% | +23.64% | +50.28% | |
| Flows | HBF | +$2 M | +$12 M | +$26 M | +$28 M | +$62 M |
HBF.U | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
HBF vs HBF.U exposure
Countries
HBF
USA
85.80%
Other
10.50%
HBF.U
USA
85.80%
Other
10.50%
Sectors
HBF
Information Technology
33.00%
Financials
14.50%
Communication Services
11.30%
Consumer Staples
10.80%
Other
10.50%
Consumer Discretionary
10.00%
Other
9.90%
HBF.U
Information Technology
33.00%
Financials
14.50%
Communication Services
11.30%
Consumer Staples
10.80%
Other
10.50%
Consumer Discretionary
10.00%
Other
9.90%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBF
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
6.70%
CATERPILLAR
5.80%
COCA-COLA
5.60%
CISCO-T
5.50%
APPLE
5.40%
MCDONALD'S
5.30%
PROCTERGAMBLE
5.20%
JPMORGAN CHASE
5.00%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.90%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.80%
HBF.U
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
6.70%
CATERPILLAR
5.80%
COCA-COLA
5.60%
CISCO-T
5.50%
APPLE
5.40%
MCDONALD'S
5.30%
PROCTERGAMBLE
5.20%
JPMORGAN CHASE
5.00%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.90%
WELLS FARGO
4.80%
Diversification
HBF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
54.20%
HBF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
54.20%
Characteristics
Compare
HBF
HBF.U
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.53% | 6.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 24, 2014 | June 26, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about HBF and HBF.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBF or HBF.U?
As of June 12, 2026, HBF has returned 6.65% year to date, while HBF.U has returned 7.54%. HBF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBF or HBF.U?
As of June 12, 2026, HBF manages $562.25 M in assets, while HBF.U manages $41.60 M. HBF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBF and HBF.U managed?
HBF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HBF.U is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HBF and HBF.U emphasize?
HBF is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. HBF.U is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBF or HBF.U?
Year to date, HBF has seen +$25.89 M in net flows, compared with +$1.62 M for HBF.U. HBF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBF and HBF.U compare?
HBF has an expense ratio of 0.91%, while HBF.U has an expense ratio of 0.91%.
What are the top holdings of HBF and HBF.U?
HBF's largest holdings include VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, CATERPILLAR, and COCA-COLA. HBF.U's top holdings include VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, CATERPILLAR, and COCA-COLA.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBF or HBF.U?
HBF holds 18 securities, while HBF.U holds 18. On holdings count, HBF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.