VS
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HBGD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Finance, while CHPS leans towards Technology. When evaluating costs, HBGD features a management fee (MER) of 0.59%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, HBGD has returned 26.42% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 39.37% with +$142 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBGD
CHPS
| AuM | $45.66 M | $360.88 M |
| Management Fees | 0.59% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.59% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBGD | -23.11% | -15.87% | +26.42% | +17.99% | +231.37% |
CHPS | -13.02% | -10.29% | +39.37% | +38.03% | +208.10% | |
| Flows | HBGD | -$4 M | -$4 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M |
CHPS | +$12 M | +$2 M | +$142 M | +$152 M | +$197 M |
HBGD vs CHPS exposure
Countries
HBGD
USA
52.86%
Taiwan
14.68%
Other
32.46%
CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
Sectors
HBGD
Technology
58.55%
Finance
36.95%
CHPS
Technology
99.99%
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBGD
Global Unichip Corp.
3.27%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
2.90%
Sharplink, Inc.
2.69%
Hashkey Holdings Ltd.
2.56%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
2.48%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
2.46%
Getac Holdings Corp.
2.43%
Oracle Corp.
2.43%
Bullish
2.41%
Winbond Electronics Corp.
2.40%
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
Diversification
HBGD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
26.03%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
Characteristics
Compare
HBGD
CHPS
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.31% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 21, 2018 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HBGD and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBGD or CHPS?
As of October 23, 2026, HBGD has returned 26.42% year to date, while CHPS has returned 39.37%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBGD or CHPS?
As of October 23, 2026, HBGD manages $45.66 M in assets, while CHPS manages $360.88 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBGD and CHPS managed?
HBGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD benchmark. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do HBGD and CHPS emphasize?
HBGD is most exposed to Technology and Finance. CHPS is most exposed to Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBGD or CHPS?
Year to date, HBGD has seen +$1.21 M in net flows, compared with +$142.21 M for CHPS. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBGD and CHPS compare?
HBGD has an expense ratio of 0.59%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of HBGD and CHPS?
HBGD's largest holdings include Global Unichip Corp., Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc., and Sharplink, Inc.. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HBGD or CHPS?
HBGD holds 47 securities, while CHPS holds 18. On holdings count, HBGD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HBGD and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.