VS
When evaluating costs, HBGD features a management fee (MER) of 0.59%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, HBGD has returned 43.94% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 50.85% with +$140 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBGD
CHPS
| AuM | $55.38 M | $386.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.59% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBGD | -18.96% | +7.66% | +43.94% | +87.11% | +207.51% |
CHPS | -7.26% | +12.61% | +50.85% | +82.61% | +203.22% | |
| Flows | HBGD | +$0 M | +$8 M | +$5 M | +$11 M | +$12 M |
CHPS | +$25 M | +$96 M | +$140 M | +$160 M | +$190 M |
HBGD vs CHPS exposure
Countries
HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
As of July 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HBGD
CHPS
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.27% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 21, 2018 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HBGD and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBGD or CHPS?
As of July 24, 2026, HBGD has returned 43.94% year to date, while CHPS has returned 50.85%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBGD or CHPS?
As of July 24, 2026, HBGD manages $55.38 M in assets, while CHPS manages $386.44 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBGD and CHPS managed?
HBGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD benchmark. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBGD or CHPS?
Year to date, HBGD has seen +$5.06 M in net flows, compared with +$139.79 M for CHPS. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBGD and CHPS compare?
HBGD has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
Recent articles about HBGD and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.