VS
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HBGD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Finance, while HEWB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, HBGD features a management fee (MER) of 0.59%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, HBGD has returned 48.97% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 30.27% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBGD
HEWB
| AuM | $57.31 M | $343.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.59% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBGD | +1.14% | -19.51% | +48.97% | +92.11% | +254.15% |
HEWB | -1.83% | +8.84% | +30.27% | +54.40% | +156.87% | |
| Flows | HBGD | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$5 M | +$10 M | +$12 M |
HEWB | +$0 M | +$15 M | +$27 M | +$26 M | +$33 M |
HBGD vs HEWB exposure
Countries
HBGD
USA
52.21%
Taiwan
12.97%
Other
9.00%
Other
25.82%
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
HBGD
Technology
55.50%
Finance
35.50%
Other
9.00%
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBGD
Ambarella, Inc.
2.80%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
2.63%
Getac Holdings Corp.
2.55%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
2.48%
Equinix, Inc.
2.44%
ADATA Technology Co., Ltd.
2.43%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.39%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.37%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Oracle Corp.
2.32%
HEWB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
HBGD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
24.76%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HBGD
HEWB
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.26% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 21, 2018 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about HBGD and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBGD or HEWB?
As of September 2, 2026, HBGD has returned 48.97% year to date, while HEWB has returned 30.27%. HBGD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBGD or HEWB?
As of September 2, 2026, HBGD manages $57.31 M in assets, while HEWB manages $343.43 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBGD and HEWB managed?
HBGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HBGD and HEWB emphasize?
HBGD is most exposed to Technology and Finance. HEWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBGD or HEWB?
Year to date, HBGD has seen +$5.06 M in net flows, compared with +$26.91 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBGD and HEWB compare?
HBGD has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HBGD and HEWB?
HBGD's largest holdings include Ambarella, Inc. and Digital Realty Trust, Inc.. HEWB's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBGD or HEWB?
HBGD holds 46 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, HBGD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HBGD and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.