HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page
VS
XCV
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF

Full XCV fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) vs iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HBNK provides Financials exposures, while XCV is primarily weighted in Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, HBNK features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.5% for XCV. Performance-wise, HBNK has returned 4.26% year-to-date with -$244 M in net flows, whereas XCV is at 9.26% with +$43 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.0%Mar 6Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HBNK
+0.90%+3.13%+4.26%+65.79%-
XCV
+2.94%+9.05%+9.26%+55.69%+92.24%
Flows
HBNK
-$151 M-$243 M-$244 M-$505 M-
XCV
+$28 M+$43 M+$43 M+$48 M+$7 M

HBNK vs XCV exposure

Countries

HBNK
Canada
99.69%
XCV
Canada
99.66%

Sectors

HBNK
Financials
99.69%
XCV
Financials
59.01%
Energy
27.10%
Other
13.89%
As of April 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%
XCV
TORONTO DOMINION
9.76%
ROYAL BK CANADA
9.26%
ENBRIDGE
7.96%
BANK OF MONTREAL
7.40%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
6.72%
BNS
6.63%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
6.27%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.65%
TC ENERGY CORP
4.58%
MANULIFE-S
4.22%

Diversification

HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%
XCV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
67.44%

Characteristics

Compare
HBNK
XCV
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADDow Jones Canada Select Value Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.15%2.51%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 5, 2023November 6, 2006

Frequently asked questions about HBNK and XCV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBNK or XCV?
As of April 6, 2026, HBNK has returned 4.26% year to date, while XCV has returned 9.26%. XCV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBNK or XCV?
As of April 6, 2026, HBNK manages $823.94 M in assets, while XCV manages $156.39 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBNK and XCV managed?
HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XCV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Dow Jones Canada Select Value Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HBNK and XCV emphasize?
HBNK is most exposed to Financials. XCV is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBNK or XCV?
Year to date, HBNK has seen -$243.78 M in net flows, compared with +$43.39 M for XCV. XCV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBNK and XCV compare?
HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%, while XCV has an expense ratio of 0.55%.
What are the top holdings of HBNK and XCV?
HBNK's largest holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION. XCV's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, ROYAL BK CANADA, and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBNK or XCV?
HBNK holds 6 securities, while XCV holds 35. On holdings count, XCV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HBNK and XCV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds