HCLN
Harvest Clean Energy ETF

Full HCLN fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare Harvest Clean Energy ETF (HCLN) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HCLN provides Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while HEWB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, HCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, HCLN has returned 13.52% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 15.51% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HCLN
+4.83%+6.25%+13.52%+49.95%-3.31%
HEWB
+4.93%+12.73%+15.51%+62.92%+122.04%
Flows
HCLN
+$0 M-$0 M+$0 M-$1 M-$13 M
HEWB
+$5 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

HCLN vs HEWB exposure

Countries

HCLN
USA
25.20%
Other
12.10%
Spain
10.60%
Canada
8.40%
Denmark
7.50%
Germany
7.30%
Other
28.90%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

HCLN
Utilities
43.10%
Industrials
22.30%
Information Technology
16.20%
Other
14.20%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HCLN
VERBIO VEREINIGTE BIOENERGIE
4.20%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
3.70%
BORALEX
3.60%
NORTHLAND POWER
3.10%
NORDEX
3.10%
SOLARIA ENERGIA Y MEDIO AMBIENTE
3.10%
VERBUND
2.80%
GRENERGY RENOVABLES
2.80%
PLUG POWER
2.60%
SCATEC ASA
2.60%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

HCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 37 total
31.60%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
HCLN
HEWB
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateJanuary 14, 2021January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about HCLN and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HCLN or HEWB?
As of May 12, 2026, HCLN has returned 13.52% year to date, while HEWB has returned 15.51%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HCLN or HEWB?
As of May 12, 2026, HCLN manages $22.15 M in assets, while HEWB manages $291.45 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HCLN and HEWB managed?
HCLN is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HCLN and HEWB emphasize?
HCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HCLN or HEWB?
Year to date, HCLN has seen +$0.33 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HCLN and HEWB compare?
HCLN has an expense ratio of 0.69%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HCLN and HEWB?
HCLN's largest holdings include VERBIO VEREINIGTE BIOENERGIE, SOLAREDGE TECH/D, and BORALEX. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HCLN or HEWB?
HCLN holds 37 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, HCLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HCLN and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds