VS
When evaluating costs, HERO features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.45% for FCIV. Performance-wise, HERO has returned 12.97% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas FCIV is at 16.68% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HERO
FCIV
| AuM | $18.10 M | $2,659.88 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.89% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HERO | +1.03% | -3.03% | -12.97% | -20.42% | +47.51% |
FCIV | -0.94% | -3.57% | +16.68% | +24.35% | +88.07% | |
| Flows | HERO | +$5 M | +$5 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | -$13 M |
FCIV | +$80 M | +$256 M | +$1,071 M | +$1,249 M | +$2,021 M |
HERO vs FCIV exposure
Countries
HERO
Japan
47.30%
USA
16.82%
China
13.80%
Republic of Korea
9.55%
Other
12.53%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HERO
Technology
100.12%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HERO
Nintendo Co., Ltd.
12.53%
KONAMI Group Corp.
10.29%
NetEase, Inc.
9.85%
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
8.58%
Roblox Corp.
8.10%
Capcom Co., Ltd.
7.78%
NEXON Co., Ltd.
7.02%
International Games System Co., Ltd.
3.70%
Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd.
3.59%
KRAFTON, Inc
3.51%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HERO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 43 total
74.96%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HERO
FCIV
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive eGaming PI Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.52% | 2.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 17, 2019 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HERO and FCIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HERO or FCIV?
As of October 29, 2026, HERO has returned -12.97% year to date, while FCIV has returned 16.68%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HERO or FCIV?
As of October 29, 2026, HERO manages $18.10 M in assets, while FCIV manages $2.66 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HERO and FCIV managed?
HERO is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive eGaming PI Index - CAD benchmark. FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HERO or FCIV?
Year to date, HERO has seen +$3.02 M in net flows, compared with +$1,070.83 M for FCIV. FCIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HERO and FCIV compare?
HERO has an expense ratio of 0.89%, while FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about HERO and FCIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.