HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEWB and HBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Financials. When evaluating costs, HEWB features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HEWB has returned 4.17% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 4.26% with -$244 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Mar 6Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEWB
+0.87%+3.05%+4.17%+65.45%+102.30%
HBNK
+0.90%+3.13%+4.26%+65.79%-
Flows
HEWB
+$0 M+$5 M+$5 M-$0 M-$11 M
HBNK
-$151 M-$243 M-$244 M-$505 M-

HEWB vs HBNK exposure

Countries

HEWB
Canada
99.99%
HBNK
Canada
99.69%

Sectors

HEWB
Financials
99.99%
HBNK
Financials
99.69%
As of April 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEWB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.51%
BNS
17.08%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.02%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.58%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
15.93%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.87%
HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%

Diversification

HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%

Characteristics

Compare
HEWB
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%3.15%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 23, 2019July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HEWB and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEWB or HBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, HEWB has returned 4.17% year to date, while HBNK has returned 4.26%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEWB or HBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, HEWB manages $255.59 M in assets, while HBNK manages $823.94 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEWB and HBNK managed?
HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEWB and HBNK emphasize?
HEWB is most exposed to Financials. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEWB or HBNK?
Year to date, HEWB has seen +$4.56 M in net flows, compared with -$243.78 M for HBNK. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEWB and HBNK compare?
HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of HEWB and HBNK?
HEWB's largest holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, BNS, and CDN IMPERIAL BK. HBNK's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEWB or HBNK?
HEWB holds 6 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HEWB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEWB and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds