HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEWB and ZEB provide the same top sector exposures: Financials. When evaluating costs, HEWB features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HEWB has returned 4.17% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 4.2% with -$723 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Mar 6Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEWB
+0.87%+3.05%+4.17%+65.45%+102.30%
ZEB
+0.88%+3.08%+4.20%+65.52%+102.53%
Flows
HEWB
+$0 M+$5 M+$5 M-$0 M-$11 M
ZEB
+$311 M-$835 M-$723 M-$1,943 M-$1,208 M

HEWB vs ZEB exposure

Countries

HEWB
Canada
99.99%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HEWB
Financials
99.99%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of April 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEWB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.51%
BNS
17.08%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.02%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.58%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
15.93%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.87%
ZEB
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.54%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.45%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.23%
BNS
16.23%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.78%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.77%

Diversification

HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HEWB
ZEB
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 23, 2019October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about HEWB and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEWB or ZEB?
As of April 6, 2026, HEWB has returned 4.17% year to date, while ZEB has returned 4.20%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEWB or ZEB?
As of April 6, 2026, HEWB manages $255.59 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.05 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEWB and ZEB managed?
HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEWB and ZEB emphasize?
HEWB is most exposed to Financials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEWB or ZEB?
Year to date, HEWB has seen +$4.56 M in net flows, compared with -$723.44 M for ZEB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEWB and ZEB compare?
HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HEWB and ZEB?
HEWB's largest holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, BNS, and CDN IMPERIAL BK. ZEB's top holdings include CDN IMPERIAL BK, NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEWB or ZEB?
HEWB holds 6 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HEWB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEWB and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds