VS
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF (HHIH) and NBI Active U.S. Equity ETF (NUSA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HHIH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while NUSA leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HHIH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for NUSA. Performance-wise, HHIH has returned 2.41% year-to-date with +$72 M in net flows, whereas NUSA is at 3.78% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HHIH
NUSA
| AuM | $99.01 M | $91.29 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.62% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HHIH | +0.22% | +3.05% | +2.41% | - | - |
NUSA | -0.49% | +3.36% | +3.78% | +8.59% | +50.06% | |
| Flows | HHIH | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$72 M | - | - |
NUSA | -$11 M | -$13 M | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$50 M |
HHIH vs NUSA exposure
Countries
HHIH
USA
97.25%
NUSA
USA
95.57%
Sectors
HHIH
Technology
55.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.93%
Finance
11.36%
Healthcare
7.48%
Other
13.25%
NUSA
Technology
48.34%
Finance
12.15%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.75%
Healthcare
8.43%
Industrials
7.10%
Other
12.23%
As of July 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HHIH
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.00%
Eli Lilly & Co.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Broadcom Inc.
6.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.59%
Tesla, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.89%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
5.34%
NUSA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.83%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
6.48%
Broadcom Inc.
5.79%
Lam Research Corp.
5.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.64%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.03%
Apple, Inc.
3.84%
Danaher Corp.
3.61%
Diversification
HHIH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
66.80%
NUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
55.41%
Characteristics
Compare
HHIH
NUSA
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 19, 2025 | February 13, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HHIH and NUSA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HHIH or NUSA?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH has returned 2.41% year to date, while NUSA has returned 3.78%. NUSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HHIH or NUSA?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH manages $99.01 M in assets, while NUSA manages $91.29 M. HHIH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HHIH and NUSA managed?
HHIH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. NUSA is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HHIH and NUSA emphasize?
HHIH is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. NUSA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HHIH or NUSA?
Year to date, HHIH has seen +$72.19 M in net flows, compared with +$3.58 M for NUSA. HHIH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HHIH and NUSA compare?
HHIH has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while NUSA has an expense ratio of 0.62%.
What are the top holdings of HHIH and NUSA?
HHIH's largest holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., and Apple, Inc.. NUSA's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HHIH or NUSA?
HHIH holds 20 securities, while NUSA holds 30. On holdings count, NUSA is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.