VS
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF (HHIH) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HHIH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while QQCE leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HHIH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.2% for QQCE. Performance-wise, HHIH has returned 2.41% year-to-date with +$72 M in net flows, whereas QQCE is at 17.1% with +$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HHIH
QQCE
| AuM | $99.01 M | $1,039.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.45% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HHIH | +0.22% | +3.05% | +2.41% | - | - |
QQCE | -3.29% | +10.89% | +17.10% | +29.48% | +103.67% | |
| Flows | HHIH | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$72 M | - | - |
QQCE | +$2 M | +$42 M | +$95 M | +$345 M | +$773 M |
HHIH vs QQCE exposure
Countries
HHIH
USA
97.25%
QQCE
USA
95.27%
Sectors
HHIH
Technology
55.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.93%
Finance
11.36%
Healthcare
7.48%
Other
13.25%
QQCE
Technology
73.63%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.65%
Other
15.72%
As of July 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HHIH
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.00%
Eli Lilly & Co.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Broadcom Inc.
6.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.59%
Tesla, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.89%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
5.34%
QQCE
NVIDIA Corp.
9.38%
Apple, Inc.
7.52%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.27%
Microsoft Corp.
5.19%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.27%
Tesla, Inc.
2.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.79%
Intel Corp.
2.78%
Diversification
HHIH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
66.80%
QQCE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 89 total
47.89%
Characteristics
Compare
HHIH
QQCE
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Invesco |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq-100 ESG Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | August 19, 2025 | November 15, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HHIH and QQCE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HHIH or QQCE?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH has returned 2.41% year to date, while QQCE has returned 17.10%. QQCE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HHIH or QQCE?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH manages $99.01 M in assets, while QQCE manages $1.04 B. QQCE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HHIH and QQCE managed?
HHIH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. QQCE is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HHIH and QQCE emphasize?
HHIH is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. QQCE is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HHIH or QQCE?
Year to date, HHIH has seen +$72.19 M in net flows, compared with +$95.28 M for QQCE. QQCE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HHIH and QQCE compare?
HHIH has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while QQCE has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of HHIH and QQCE?
HHIH's largest holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., and Apple, Inc.. QQCE's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HHIH or QQCE?
HHIH holds 20 securities, while QQCE holds 88. On holdings count, QQCE is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HHIH and QQCE
Canadian ETF Sustainable Solutions
Sustainable ETF solutions showcased their value during periods of uncertainty in 2023.
Posted on 1/5/2024 by Kyle Anthony inESG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.