HHIH
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF

Full HHIH fund page
VS
TECH
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF

Full TECH fund page

Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF (HHIH) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HHIH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance, while TECH leans towards Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HHIH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for TECH. Performance-wise, HHIH has returned 2.41% year-to-date with +$72 M in net flows, whereas TECH is at 6.14% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4-20246810%Jun 23Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 23, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HHIH
+0.22%+3.05%+2.41%--
TECH
+1.06%-6.61%-6.14%+1.14%+78.92%
Flows
HHIH
+$4 M+$11 M+$72 M--
TECH
-$3 M+$16 M+$22 M+$27 M+$14 M

HHIH vs TECH exposure

Countries

HHIH
USA
97.25%
TECH
USA
99.48%

Sectors

HHIH
Technology
55.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.93%
Finance
11.36%
Healthcare
7.48%
Other
13.25%
TECH
Technology
82.36%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
17.12%
As of July 23, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HHIH
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.00%
Eli Lilly & Co.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Broadcom Inc.
6.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.59%
Tesla, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.89%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
5.34%
TECH
Apple, Inc.
19.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
18.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
17.12%
Microsoft Corp.
15.97%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
14.88%
Netflix, Inc.
13.26%

Diversification

HHIH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
66.80%
TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.48%

Characteristics

Compare
HHIH
TECH
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.09%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 19, 2025May 6, 2021

Frequently asked questions about HHIH and TECH

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HHIH or TECH?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH has returned 2.41% year to date, while TECH has returned -6.14%. HHIH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HHIH or TECH?
As of July 23, 2026, HHIH manages $99.01 M in assets, while TECH manages $118.26 M. TECH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HHIH and TECH managed?
HHIH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HHIH and TECH emphasize?
HHIH is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Finance. TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HHIH or TECH?
Year to date, HHIH has seen +$72.19 M in net flows, compared with +$22.19 M for TECH. HHIH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HHIH and TECH compare?
HHIH has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%.
What are the top holdings of HHIH and TECH?
HHIH's largest holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., and Apple, Inc.. TECH's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HHIH or TECH?
HHIH holds 20 securities, while TECH holds 6. On holdings count, HHIH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HHIH and TECH

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds