VS
Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.U) and iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIG.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while XHC leans towards Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HIG.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.63% for XHC. Performance-wise, HIG.U has returned 1.35% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XHC is at 6.63% with -$45 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HIG.U
XHC
| AuM | $0.83 M | $545.75 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.63% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.02% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HIG.U | +2.90% | +11.86% | +1.35% | +16.75% | +20.46% |
XHC | +3.98% | +14.84% | +6.63% | +24.55% | +20.13% | |
| Flows | HIG.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M |
XHC | +$11 M | -$2 M | -$45 M | -$11 M | -$89 M |
HIG.U vs XHC exposure
Countries
HIG.U
USA
78.99%
Other
21.01%
XHC
USA
69.39%
Switzerland
10.35%
Other
20.26%
Sectors
HIG.U
Healthcare
88.74%
Other
11.26%
XHC
Healthcare
96.86%
As of August 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HIG.U
Johnson & Johnson
5.83%
Novartis AG
5.59%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.44%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
5.42%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
4.87%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.67%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.57%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.54%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.36%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
XHC
Eli Lilly & Co.
10.91%
Johnson & Johnson
7.03%
AbbVie, Inc.
5.11%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
4.39%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.11%
AstraZeneca PLC
3.76%
Roche Holding AG
3.75%
Novartis AG
3.72%
Amgen, Inc.
2.53%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.41%
Diversification
HIG.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
49.61%
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 111 total
47.72%
Characteristics
Compare
HIG.U
XHC
| Provider | Brompton Group | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.76% | 1.82% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 3, 2018 | April 12, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about HIG.U and XHC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIG.U or XHC?
As of August 10, 2026, HIG.U has returned 1.35% year to date, while XHC has returned 6.63%. XHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIG.U or XHC?
As of August 10, 2026, HIG.U manages $0.83 M in assets, while XHC manages $545.75 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIG.U and XHC managed?
HIG.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HIG.U and XHC emphasize?
HIG.U is most exposed to Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. XHC is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIG.U or XHC?
Year to date, HIG.U has seen +$0.26 M in net flows, compared with -$45.40 M for XHC. HIG.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIG.U and XHC compare?
HIG.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of HIG.U and XHC?
HIG.U's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Novartis AG, and Eli Lilly & Co.. XHC's top holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HIG.U or XHC?
HIG.U holds 25 securities, while XHC holds 110. On holdings count, XHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HIG.U and XHC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.