VS
Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.U) and BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIG.U focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ZXLV leans towards Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, HIG.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLV. Performance-wise, HIG.U has returned 1.14% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZXLV is at 11.3% with +$29 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HIG.U
ZXLV
| AuM | $0.83 M | $45.80 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HIG.U | +2.69% | +9.83% | +1.14% | +15.83% | +19.48% |
ZXLV | +2.76% | +17.98% | +11.30% | +31.73% | - | |
| Flows | HIG.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M |
ZXLV | +$7 M | +$26 M | +$29 M | +$41 M | - |
HIG.U vs ZXLV exposure
Countries
HIG.U
USA
78.99%
Other
21.01%
ZXLV
USA
97.92%
Sectors
HIG.U
Healthcare
88.74%
Other
11.26%
ZXLV
Healthcare
97.73%
As of August 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HIG.U
Johnson & Johnson
5.83%
Novartis AG
5.59%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.44%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
5.42%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
4.87%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.67%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.57%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.54%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.36%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
ZXLV
Eli Lilly & Co.
16.57%
Johnson & Johnson
10.68%
AbbVie, Inc.
7.76%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
6.59%
Merck & Co., Inc.
5.54%
Amgen, Inc.
3.41%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.25%
Abbott Laboratories
2.76%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.74%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
2.46%
Diversification
HIG.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
49.61%
ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
61.77%
Characteristics
Compare
HIG.U
ZXLV
| Provider | Brompton Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.77% | 0.45% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 3, 2018 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about HIG.U and ZXLV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIG.U or ZXLV?
As of August 12, 2026, HIG.U has returned 1.14% year to date, while ZXLV has returned 11.30%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIG.U or ZXLV?
As of August 12, 2026, HIG.U manages $0.83 M in assets, while ZXLV manages $45.80 M. ZXLV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIG.U and ZXLV managed?
HIG.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do HIG.U and ZXLV emphasize?
HIG.U is most exposed to Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZXLV is most exposed to Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIG.U or ZXLV?
Year to date, HIG.U has seen +$0.26 M in net flows, compared with +$28.80 M for ZXLV. ZXLV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIG.U and ZXLV compare?
HIG.U has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of HIG.U and ZXLV?
HIG.U's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Novartis AG, and Eli Lilly & Co.. ZXLV's top holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HIG.U or ZXLV?
HIG.U holds 25 securities, while ZXLV holds 59. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HIG.U and ZXLV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.