VS
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIND focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, while XAD leans towards Industrials, Materials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, HIND features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.39% for XAD. Performance-wise, HIND has returned 12.78% year-to-date with +$25 M in net flows, whereas XAD is at 12.43% with +$58 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HIND
XAD
| AuM | $102.00 M | $180.95 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.43% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.83% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HIND | +2.84% | +4.99% | +12.78% | +23.39% | - |
XAD | +7.06% | +1.83% | +12.43% | +34.36% | - | |
| Flows | HIND | +$7 M | +$15 M | +$25 M | +$39 M | - |
XAD | -$7 M | +$0 M | +$58 M | +$114 M | - |
HIND vs XAD exposure
Countries
HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%
XAD
USA
97.77%
Sectors
HIND
Industrials
95.60%
XAD
Industrials
89.15%
Other
7.05%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HIND
US36828A1016
5.20%
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%
XAD
GENERAL ELECTRIC
19.42%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
15.09%
BOEING U
10.24%
GENERAL DYNAMICS
4.78%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
4.74%
TRANSDIGM GROUP
4.53%
L3 HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES
4.32%
LOCKHEED MARTIN
3.92%
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
3.88%
US7731211089
3.27%
Diversification
HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%
XAD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 44 total
74.20%
Characteristics
Compare
HIND
XAD
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.86% | 0.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 15, 2024 | September 6, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about HIND and XAD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIND or XAD?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND has returned 12.78% year to date, while XAD has returned 12.43%. HIND is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIND or XAD?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND manages $102.00 M in assets, while XAD manages $180.95 M. XAD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIND and XAD managed?
HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. XAD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HIND and XAD emphasize?
HIND is most exposed to Industrials. XAD is most exposed to Industrials, Materials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIND or XAD?
Year to date, HIND has seen +$25.20 M in net flows, compared with +$57.68 M for XAD. XAD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIND and XAD compare?
HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while XAD has an expense ratio of 0.43%.
What are the top holdings of HIND and XAD?
HIND's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. XAD's top holdings include GENERAL ELECTRIC, RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD, and BOEING U.
Which ETF is more diversified: HIND or XAD?
HIND holds 20 securities, while XAD holds 36. On holdings count, XAD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HIND and XAD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.