HIND
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF

Full HIND fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIND focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HIND features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HIND has returned 12.78% year-to-date with +$25 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 23.88% with -$1,116 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HIND
+2.84%+4.99%+12.78%+23.39%-
ZEB
+7.80%+20.31%+23.88%+66.43%+145.04%
Flows
HIND
+$7 M+$15 M+$25 M+$39 M-
ZEB
-$85 M-$309 M-$1,116 M-$946 M-$1,896 M

HIND vs ZEB exposure

Countries

HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HIND
Industrials
95.60%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HIND
US36828A1016
5.20%
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HIND
ZEB
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.86%2.44%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 15, 2024October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about HIND and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIND or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND has returned 12.78% year to date, while ZEB has returned 23.88%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIND or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND manages $102.00 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.54 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIND and ZEB managed?
HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HIND and ZEB emphasize?
HIND is most exposed to Industrials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIND or ZEB?
Year to date, HIND has seen +$25.20 M in net flows, compared with -$1,115.72 M for ZEB. HIND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIND and ZEB compare?
HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HIND and ZEB?
HIND's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: HIND or ZEB?
HIND holds 20 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HIND is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HIND and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds