HIND
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF

Full HIND fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIND focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, while ZSP leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, HIND features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, HIND has returned 12.78% year-to-date with +$25 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.3% with +$566 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HIND
+2.84%+4.99%+12.78%+23.39%-
ZSP
+1.90%+12.40%+10.30%+26.61%+83.75%
Flows
HIND
+$7 M+$15 M+$25 M+$39 M-
ZSP
+$89 M+$283 M+$566 M+$1,532 M+$5,079 M

HIND vs ZSP exposure

Countries

HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%
ZSP
USA
97.06%

Sectors

HIND
Industrials
95.60%
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HIND
US36828A1016
5.20%
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%

Diversification

HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%

Characteristics

Compare
HIND
ZSP
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.86%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 15, 2024November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about HIND and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIND or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND has returned 12.78% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.30%. HIND is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIND or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND manages $102.00 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.78 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIND and ZSP managed?
HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HIND and ZSP emphasize?
HIND is most exposed to Industrials. ZSP is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIND or ZSP?
Year to date, HIND has seen +$25.20 M in net flows, compared with +$565.61 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIND and ZSP compare?
HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of HIND and ZSP?
HIND's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZSP's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: HIND or ZSP?
HIND holds 20 securities, while ZSP holds 477. On holdings count, ZSP is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HIND and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds