VS
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIND focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, HIND features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HIND has returned 12.78% year-to-date with +$25 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.43% with -$76 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HIND
ZUT
| AuM | $102.00 M | $893.16 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HIND | +2.84% | +4.99% | +12.78% | +23.39% | - |
ZUT | +3.72% | +9.48% | +20.43% | +29.41% | +47.71% | |
| Flows | HIND | +$7 M | +$15 M | +$25 M | +$39 M | - |
ZUT | -$15 M | +$4 M | -$76 M | +$122 M | +$233 M |
HIND vs ZUT exposure
Countries
HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
HIND
Industrials
95.60%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HIND
US36828A1016
5.20%
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
HIND
ZUT
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.86% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 15, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about HIND and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIND or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND has returned 12.78% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.43%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIND or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND manages $102.00 M in assets, while ZUT manages $893.16 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIND and ZUT managed?
HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HIND and ZUT emphasize?
HIND is most exposed to Industrials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIND or ZUT?
Year to date, HIND has seen +$25.20 M in net flows, compared with -$76.24 M for ZUT. HIND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIND and ZUT compare?
HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of HIND and ZUT?
HIND's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HIND or ZUT?
HIND holds 20 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, HIND is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HIND and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.