VS
When evaluating costs, HISA features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, HISA has returned 0.69% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 4.87% with +$471 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HISA
ZSP
| AuM | $1,303.01 M | $22,525.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.36% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HISA | +0.17% | +0.50% | +0.69% | +2.33% | +11.70% |
ZSP | +7.68% | +3.24% | +4.87% | +27.90% | +79.73% | |
| Flows | HISA | +$8 M | +$90 M | +$95 M | -$62 M | -$169 M |
ZSP | +$277 M | +$139 M | +$471 M | +$1,543 M | +$4,694 M |
HISA vs ZSP exposure
Countries
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.98%
Sectors
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
33.63%
Financials
10.49%
Communication Services
10.10%
Consumer Discretionary
9.94%
Health Care
9.40%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
18.10%
As of May 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.39%
APPLE
6.67%
MICROSOFT-T
4.90%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.93%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.56%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.35%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.60%
Diversification
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.04%
Characteristics
Compare
HISA
ZSP
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.30% | 0.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 21, 2019 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about HISA and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HISA or ZSP?
As of May 1, 2026, HISA has returned 0.69% year to date, while ZSP has returned 4.87%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HISA or ZSP?
As of May 1, 2026, HISA manages $1.30 B in assets, while ZSP manages $22.53 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HISA and ZSP managed?
HISA is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HISA or ZSP?
Year to date, HISA has seen +$95.41 M in net flows, compared with +$470.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HISA and ZSP compare?
HISA has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about HISA and ZSP
High Interest Cash ETFs: All You Need to Know Heading Into 2024
Interest in these ETFs has persisted throughout 2023 amid a "higher for longer" interest rate environment.
Posted on 12/11/2023 by Jean-Charles Senant inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.