HLIF
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF

Full HLIF fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page

Compare Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF (HLIF) vs BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HLIF and ZWC provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, HLIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, HLIF has returned 15.37% year-to-date with +$21 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 10.88% with +$208 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HLIF
+2.02%+7.77%+15.37%+36.15%+73.52%
ZWC
+1.23%+4.53%+10.88%+28.02%+61.44%
Flows
HLIF
+$7 M+$12 M+$21 M+$17 M+$31 M
ZWC
+$40 M+$129 M+$208 M+$282 M+$219 M

HLIF vs ZWC exposure

Countries

HLIF
Canada
93.00%
ZWC
Canada
98.39%

Sectors

HLIF
Financials
33.20%
Energy
19.80%
Materials
10.50%
Other
10.30%
Utilities
9.80%
Other
16.40%
ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
As of June 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HLIF
BARRICK GOLD
3.60%
LUNDIN GOLD INC
3.60%
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL
3.50%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
3.40%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.40%
IGM FINANCIAL
3.40%
CENOVUS ENERGY
3.40%
TORONTO DOMINION
3.40%
ENBRIDGE
3.30%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
3.30%
ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%

Diversification

HLIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
34.30%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%

Characteristics

Compare
HLIF
ZWC
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.09%5.65%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 13, 2022February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about HLIF and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HLIF or ZWC?
As of June 10, 2026, HLIF has returned 15.37% year to date, while ZWC has returned 10.88%. HLIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HLIF or ZWC?
As of June 10, 2026, HLIF manages $171.79 M in assets, while ZWC manages $2.31 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HLIF and ZWC managed?
HLIF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HLIF and ZWC emphasize?
HLIF is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HLIF or ZWC?
Year to date, HLIF has seen +$21.14 M in net flows, compared with +$207.58 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HLIF and ZWC compare?
HLIF has an expense ratio of 0.79%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of HLIF and ZWC?
HLIF's largest holdings include BARRICK GOLD, LUNDIN GOLD INC, and MAGNA INTERNATIONAL. ZWC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: HLIF or ZWC?
HLIF holds 28 securities, while ZWC holds 34. On holdings count, ZWC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HLIF and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds