HLIT
Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF

Full HLIT fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, HLIT features a management fee (MER) of 0.89%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, HLIT has returned 6.52% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 14.37% with +$458 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HLIT
+7.29%-15.15%+6.52%+51.46%-29.89%
ZSP
-1.76%+1.99%+14.37%+21.17%+79.58%
Flows
HLIT
+$0 M-$1 M-$1 M+$2 M-$2 M
ZSP
+$63 M+$125 M+$458 M+$892 M+$5,270 M

HLIT vs ZSP exposure

Countries

HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.51%

Sectors

HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
44.85%
Finance
14.06%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.97%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
15.53%
As of September 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Apple, Inc.
7.66%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.24%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.07%
Broadcom Inc.
2.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%

Diversification

HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.19%

Characteristics

Compare
HLIT
ZSP
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USDS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.11%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 23, 2021November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about HLIT and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HLIT or ZSP?
As of September 3, 2026, HLIT has returned 6.52% year to date, while ZSP has returned 14.37%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HLIT or ZSP?
As of September 3, 2026, HLIT manages $20.86 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.51 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HLIT and ZSP managed?
HLIT is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HLIT or ZSP?
Year to date, HLIT has seen -$0.57 M in net flows, compared with +$457.96 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HLIT and ZSP compare?
HLIT has an expense ratio of 0.89%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about HLIT and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds