HMMJ
Global X Marijuana Life Sciences Index ETF

Full HMMJ fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, HMMJ features a management fee (MER) of 0.95%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, HMMJ has returned 5.07% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 11.19% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HMMJ
-0.58%+0.91%-5.07%+5.97%-12.19%
XIC
+2.09%+6.97%+11.19%+34.35%+90.68%
Flows
HMMJ
-$1 M-$1 M-$1 M-$6 M-$32 M
XIC
+$420 M+$2,784 M+$5,677 M+$7,745 M+$11,716 M

HMMJ vs XIC exposure

Countries

HMMJ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%

Sectors

HMMJ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HMMJ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%

Diversification

HMMJ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%

Characteristics

Compare
HMMJ
XIC
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNorth American Marijuana Total Return Index - CADS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.37%2.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 16, 2017February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about HMMJ and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HMMJ or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, HMMJ has returned -5.07% year to date, while XIC has returned 11.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HMMJ or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, HMMJ manages $43.31 M in assets, while XIC manages $30.26 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HMMJ and XIC managed?
HMMJ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the North American Marijuana Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HMMJ or XIC?
Year to date, HMMJ has seen -$1.06 M in net flows, compared with +$5,676.75 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HMMJ and XIC compare?
HMMJ has an expense ratio of 1.00%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about HMMJ and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds