VS
When evaluating costs, HNU features a management fee (MER) of 1.34%, compared to 1.4% for SLVU. Performance-wise, HNU has returned 60.93% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas SLVU is at 69.85% with +$88 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HNU
SLVU
| AuM | $250.53 M | $117.74 M |
| Management Fees | 1.34% | 1.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.38% | 1.38% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HNU | -21.27% | -17.79% | -60.93% | -63.42% | -96.24% |
SLVU | -27.53% | -23.61% | -69.85% | -39.50% | +66.35% | |
| Flows | HNU | +$130 M | +$66 M | +$14 M | -$20 M | +$186 M |
SLVU | +$17 M | +$24 M | +$88 M | +$83 M | +$54 M |
HNU vs SLVU exposure
Countries
HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
SLVU
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
SLVU
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
SLVU
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
SLVU
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HNU
SLVU
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Horizons Natural Gas Rolling Futures Index - USD | Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Commodity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2008 | June 29, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HNU and SLVU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HNU or SLVU?
As of October 29, 2026, HNU has returned -60.93% year to date, while SLVU has returned -69.85%. HNU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HNU or SLVU?
As of October 29, 2026, HNU manages $250.53 M in assets, while SLVU manages $117.74 M. HNU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HNU and SLVU managed?
HNU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Horizons Natural Gas Rolling Futures Index - USD benchmark. SLVU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HNU or SLVU?
Year to date, HNU has seen +$14.20 M in net flows, compared with +$87.65 M for SLVU. SLVU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HNU and SLVU compare?
HNU has an expense ratio of 1.38%, while SLVU has an expense ratio of 1.38%.
Recent articles about HNU and SLVU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.